Paul Robeson was called the “Great Forerunner” (of the black messiah to come). For a time it was thought that he could be the prophesied, black messiah, who has been anticipated in the black community for 200 years or longer, a mystical leader, who would overturn the satanic white system and liberate the blacks of the world.
Robeson was the mentor of Frank Marshall Davis, Obama’s own mentor. For this reason it is believable that Davis put the idea of the mystical black messiah in Obama’s head at a very early age. He had contacts via Paul Robeson to people, who could provide funds and help advance Obama in his education and in politics. It was no accident that Obama joined Jeremiah Wright’s church which has a black liberation doctrine, based on a black messiah, who would be an ordinary man.
Robeson was a world-famous singer and actor with many powerful contacts in other countries hostile to the United States. He was a secular black nationalist and a communist sympathizer. Robeson thought that communism could be used to liberate Africa from colonialism. Robeson was asked to run as his vice-presidential candidate by famous occultist and communist sympathizer, Henry Wallace, who ran for President in 1948 as the candidate of the New Progressive Party. Wallace had to drop out of the race after some bizarre letters to his occult guru in Russia were published in the press.
At this pro-communist concert/rally in Peekskill, Robeson was said to have lead the first communist paramilitary in the United States. Afterwards his passport was confiscated for a time by the FBI as a security risk.
Spike Lee says that Obama was the “Savior” and a “Black Jesus”. It should be recognized that this idea of a black savior has existed as a cult idea for a very long time in the black community. Black Nationalism is an occult movement that has existed as a mass movement for nearly 100 years and several groups have worshiped their leaders or other men as the black messiah and divine beings.
In general black nationalism cult doctrine is that the black race is God. It is a lot like the belief system of Charlie Manson, Jimmy Jones or David Koresh, all of whom saw themselves as the messiah and savior. The Nazis have a similar cult doctrine that the Aryan race is God.
The Rastafarians are a branch of black nationalism and worship the former emperor of Ethiopia, Haile Salassie, as the black Christ.
The Nation of Islam worships their founder, Fard Muhammad, as Allah in the flesh. Louis Farrakhan, the current head of the Nation of Islam has also said that he is God. Farrakhan declared Obama to be the black Messiah during the 2008 campaign.
The Yahweh Nation cult worshiped their founder as God, Yahweh ben Yahweh. Yahweh ben Yahweh was convicted of conspiracy in the serial killing of about 15 random whites and dissidents.
Malachi Z York declared himself to be God. He is currently in prison for molesting dozens of children of his cult members.
The D.C. Sniper, John Allen Muhammad was a member of the Nation of Islam and was thought to be associated with the Nation of Gods and Earths, an off-shoot of the Nation of Islam. He left a note for the police that said, “just call me God.”
The Black Liberation Theology of Obama’s Trinity church in Chicago was inspired by the Nation of Islam and teaches that the black race is the “manifestation of God on earth” and that messiahs will be self-exalted individuals from the black race.
When Obama’s followers refer to him as the Savior, Messiah or God. This should be taken very seriously, because black nationalist doctrines teach that the black man is literally God and that the white race is the devil. It is extremely dangerous to have a president with this kind of cult religious background.
Nancy Pelosi talks about communicating with the spirits of dead suffrage leaders in the video at the site below, Susan B. Anthony and others. To understand where this kookiness come from, you should know some background history of the progressives. Here is just an outline.
You may recall that self-proclaimed progressive, Hillary Clinton, once claimed to be channeling Eleanor Roosevelt and Mahatma Ghandi. Mitch Horowitz in the book “Occult America” points out that the original Progressive Party of the 1800’s was associated with the Spiritualism movement, that is people, who communicate with the dead via seances and channeling. The New Progressive Party was founded in the late 1940’s by occultist, Henry Wallace, who was Franklin D. Roosevelts Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Commerce and Vice-President.
Henry Wallace was the person, who convinced Theodore Roosevelt to put the New-World-Order occult symbolism on the dollar bill, the pyramid with the all-seeing eye, etc. Wallace was a sympathizer of communism and had to drop out of the 1948 race for president, when his letters to his Rasputin-like Russian guru were discovered and published.
Wallace’s pick for running mate in the 1948 election was another communist sympathizer and world famous black singer/actor, named Paul Robeson. Robeson was a mentor to Frank Marshall Davis and is the one, who suggested that Davis go to Hawaii to organize the plantation workers there.
Robeson was considered to be a potential black nationalist messiah, as Obama has been heralded to be by people like Louis Farrakhan and Oprah Winfrey. The black messiah will unite blacks and “transform” (read destroy) the current American system as collective retribution for slavery. The FBI took away Robeson’s passport for a time during the Cold War, because they considered him to be a potential threat to national security.
Robeson apparently never belonged to the Communist Party. He thought the Communist Party could be used to liberate Africa from colonialism. Black Nationalists have worked with communists, as well as certain white supremacist groups, when they have common interests. Robeson might be considered to be a secular black nationalist.
Some of our top politicians have occult fantasies of world transformation into a kind of totalitarian world Utopia. There is a long history of it and a relatively small group of such people have been connected for generations, who are also connected to Obama. The idea of a “black messiah” who would subvert and transform America and the world is an old idea that is connected to Obama via Frank Marshall Davis and the occult circle of politicians and celebrities around Henry Wallace and Paul Robeson. Because of these associations with occultists and black nationalism, it is believable that Obama was raised from a young age that he could become a black messiah. As it turned out, he was able to gain the Presidency in order to carry out that occult agenda that was probably instilled in him from a very early age.
Dinesh D’Souza is right that Obama is an anti-colonialist as far as that goes. But it does not go very deeply into Obama’s motivations. Maybe that is necessary in order to reach the most people and sell the most books and movie tickets? There is an overall tendency to not dig too deeply into such topics, probably, because much of the public does not want to deal with the real Obama. It would scare the hell out of them and they would not want to look at it. So, maybe it has to be watered down a little to get the masses to pay a little attention.
In any case, if you are able to stand it, here’s the truth. Black Liberation Theology teaches that America is oppressing the rest of the world (non-white races) and must be destroyed to liberate the world. This can be called anti-colonialism, but the goal is not just to liberate the non-white nations, but to destroy America as we have known it along with white society and the traditional church. It would be absurd to assume that Obama does not know what the doctrine of his church is really about.
Black Liberation Theology was inspired by the doctrine of Nation of Islam, a black nationalist cult and it has a related doctrine. This old documentary produced by Mike Wallace in 1959 — before America became pathologically politically correct — explains what Black Nationalism really is. It shows the real roots of Obama’s rage. It is really “hate,” rather than “rage.”
The Real Roots of the Black Liberation Theology of Obama’s Church
Black Liberation Theology was formalized by James H. Cone nearly a decade after this documentary was made, but you can hear many aspects of it described in this documentary. Black Liberation Theology teaches that Jesus is black and is opposed to traditional Christianity. It holds, like other Black-Nationalist doctrines, that traditional Christianity was used as a tool to keep blacks in slavery and that it must be destroyed along with white society and America, as we know it, in order to liberate the non-white races and the world.
These religious ideas, on which Black Liberation Theology is based, have existed in certain segments of the black community in America and the Caribbean for 200 years and longer.
Kwame Nkrumah was also hailed as a Messiah, like Obama has been, as the article below shows. Nkrumah was the socialist dictator of Ghana, the first African county to win its independence (from the British) after WWII. He was influenced by American Black Nationalists/pan Africanists, W.E.B. Dubois and Marcus Garvey and met with Malcolm X in the 1960’s.
He started a youth organization, the Young Pioneers, that some compared to the Nazi Hitler Youth. This idea of a black messiah, who is like a God, goes back a long way in the history of Black Nationalism in America as well as in Africa. It didn’t start with Obama. Ghana was one of the countries that Obama honored with a visit on his first trip abroad after his inauguration in 2009. There is an old belief that you need dictatorship in order to liberate blacks from American (Western) white oppression.
Below is the definition of “cultural Muslim” given by the Wiki. The term means someone, who identifies with Islamic culture, but does not practice the religion. Obama had a father from an ethnically Muslim family, which he embraced in preference to his extended Christian family.
Jeremiah Wright declared that the God they worship at Trinity UCC (Yahweh) is the same as Allah. See this link for more info. Obama is also overly effusive in his public praise of Islam. For these reasons, it is correct to call Obama a “cultural Muslim” or “ethnic Muslim,” though he may not practice the religion. If you just put the word “cultural” in front of “Muslim,” it will be difficult to argue with that description. It just means he identifies culturally with Islam and is loyal to Islam. This is a rather obvious truth, indicated by his own public statements and his biographical book. It is not necessary to prove that Obama is secretly a Muslim. He has been quite open about his personal affection for Islam. He makes decisions, which puts Islamist (Muslim Brotherhood) interests above American interests. (see Egypt, Libya and Syria.)
However, that is not all he is and the perverse doctrine of his sect in Chicago also deserves to be examined. His supposedly “Christian” church in Chicago, does not have a traditional Christian doctrine, because it denies the unique divinity of Christ, as does Islam, which sees Christ as a prophet, not uniquely God.
Trinity church has a doctrine which did not require Obama to give up his personal Muslim identity. Black Liberation theology is not exclusionary as traditional Christianity is. Traditional Christians believe that Christianity is the only way to salvation. This is not the case with Black Liberation Theology and it is obvious that Obama has no love for the traditional Christian church.
Black Liberation Theology is an accretionary doctrine, which embraces features of many religions, but holds that traditional Christianity (and America) are the tools of the Antichrist. The Antichrist is equated to white society. It is similar to and was inspired by the doctrine of Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam, which is also not orthodox Islam, but a black cult doctrine that poses as Islam, just as Trinity church poses as Christianity.
Cultural Muslims are religiously unobservant, secular or irreligious individuals who still identify with the Muslim culture due to family background, personal experiences, or the social and cultural environment in which they grew up.
The term is a political neologism paralleling the term “cultural Christian”.
Malise Ruthven (2000) discussed the terms “cultural Muslim” and “nominal Muslim” as follows:
There is, however, a secondary meaning to Muslim which may shade into the first. A Muslim is one born to a Muslim father who takes on his or her parents’ confessional identity without necessarily subscribing to the beliefs and practices associated with the faith, just as a Jew may describe him- or herself as Jewish without observing the Halacha. In non-Muslim societies, such Muslims may subscribe to, and be vested with, secular identities. The Muslims of Bosnia, descendants of Slavs who converted to Islam under Ottoman rule, are not always noted for attendance at prayer, abstention from alcohol, seclusion of women and other social practices associated with believing Muslims in other parts of the world. They were officially designated as Muslims by nationality to distinguish them from Orthodox Serbs and Catholic Croats under the former Yugoslav communist regime. The label Muslim indicates their ethnicity and group allegiance, but not necessarily their religious beliefs. In this limited context (which may apply to other Muslim minorities in Europe and Asia), there may be no contradiction between being Muslim and being atheist or agnostic, just as there are Jewish atheists and Jewish agnostics… It should be noted, however, that this secular definition of Muslim (sometimes the terms cultural Muslim or nominal Muslim are used) is very far from being uncontested.
The Nazis and the Imperial Japanese, both had I-am-God cult religions that taught that the leader is God and the nation had a divine destiny to be transformed into an Utopia, according to their occult/pagan religious belief system. This is not a new idea, but goes back to the Babylonian and Egyptian mystery religions and even further. The Egyptian pharaohs were held to be the divine sons of God. The idea still exists more than you might think in cult religions and quasi-religious totalitarian political ideologies, today.
The religions of both Obama and Romney teach that man can become a “god” and the fate of the United States is fundamentally linked to their religious doctrines, which both have gnostic occult roots. In the case of Black Liberation Theology the destiny of traditional America is to be destroyed and transformed into an occult Utopia, ruled by the black race.
In Mormonism, America is supposed to become a Mormon theocracy. In both cases the transformation of America is prophesied to transform the world into an millennial kingdom on earth, which will be a real, physical, dictatorial, government lead by a human “messiah.”
It is just not a good idea, in principle, to accept this sort of occult religious idea for a president of the United States, the most powerful nation on earth with a nuclear arsenal that can obliterate the world several times over. Maybe for the president of a small powerless Third World country, say North Korea, it might not be so important, if he has a belief that he is a God.
Neither one of these men should be president, because they may well have a crackpot religious agenda, judging from their backgrounds. The office of the presidency should not be an equal opportunity position for new, home-grown religions, with a belief that leaders should be worshiped as gods.
If you vote for Romney, conservatives are just validating that kind of belief system. The Christianity-hating media wants you to do it and many politicians want you to do it. Two very good reasons to not go along with it. We should never have even let this type of thing get started by putting Obama in office. We certainly should not continue it with Romney.
In the last several decades, there has been a huge growth in occult religious movements the US. There are a lot of Republicans, as well, that have this kind of I-am-God religion and such people would like to see this type of thing made acceptable. That is really why the Republican leadership does not seriously object to Obama. It is also why many attack you so viciously, for things such as opposing Romney. There is an occult religious agenda behind it.
It’s not necessarily a conspiracy, but a very large and broad occult movement. Whether conscious or not, the public has been largely brainwashed by the mass media into rejecting traditional Christianity as bigotry and acceptance of occult religions.
The way commentators get their panties in a twist whenever Obama is compared to Hitler, you would think that no one has ever used hyperbole to make a point before. Wikipedia gives the following definition of “hyperbole.”
Hyperbole is the use of exaggeration as a rhetorical device or figure of speech. It may be used to evoke strong feelings or to create a strong impression, but is not meant to be taken literally.
Hitler is an iconic historical figure and Americans use hyperbolic comparisons to Hitler/Nazism every day to make a point, as Hank William’s Jr. did and as many others have done for this or other reasons, such as comedy. (See Jerry Seinfeld’s hilarious “Soup Nazi” skit.)
The comparison is used to mean that someone is extremely strict, inflexible or without empathy for others. Normally, people don’t get upset with this common usage, but somehow they they do become very upset when it is applied to Obama. The issue is not whether Obama is literally “Hitler,” but that there are some parallels to Nazism as a belief system in his background. It may be hyperbole, but it is hyperbole with a valid point. We hope that he does not become another Hitler.
The question is why do people think this commonly-used rhetorical device is okay to use everyday, but is way out of bounds when applied to Obama? It seems that many are so upset, when Obama is compared to Hitler, because they may have to recognize that there is a kernel of truth to the comparison and it makes them extremely uncomfortable to think that the President may somehow be Nazi-like in character.
In Obama’s case, there is more than just a speck of truth to the comparison. He has shown a willingness to use totalitarian methods, trampling on the Constitution and usurping the powers of other branches of Government.
There have always been two branches to the black liberation movement. Obama is not from the non-violent branch represented by Martin Luther King, Jr. and Booker T. Washington. Obama is from the much more racially militant Black Nationalist tradition of Malcolm X, Elijah Muhammad and Louis Farrakhan. After Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated, the more absolutist Black Nationalist branch moved to the fore.
The founder of the black nationalist mass movement in the late 1910’s was Marcus Garvey. Garvey met with the KKK in the 1920’s and began cooperation with them. He mandated that black nationalist groups should emulate white nationalist groups, such as the KKK and the Nazis and wrote that some day the black race would have their own black “Hitler.” (See “Selected Writings of Marcus Garvey,” edited by Bob Blaisdell, Dover Publication, Inc., Mineola, New York (2004), preface viii-x and pages 74-82 entitled “Hon. Marcus Garvey Tells of Interview with the Klu Klux Klan.”)
Since that time there has been a history of meetings and cooperation between black and white nationalists. In a reverse sense, the racial concept of Black Liberation Theology has some striking parallels to the racial concept of Nazism. You can learn more about this history at this link.
Obama may not be responsible for the death of 40-50 million people, but the hyperbolic comparison of Obama to Hitler does have some truth to it. The public needs to be educated about the fact that there are real parallels to Nazism in Obama’s religious background of Black Liberation Theology and Black Nationalism.
That some become angry when this comparison is made is just evidence that use of this so-called rhetorical device is effective. The comparison should be used more until people can no longer deny that there is truth to it. There should be no apologies made for speaking the truth.
I never knew whether to believe it, or not, that the tax on artificial tanning is actually a part of Obamacare. It was a bit difficult to believe and seemed that it might be urban mythical. So, I stopped by a local tanning Solon today and asked. They confirmed that there is a 10% tax on artificial sun-tanning, which is basically a tax on white people. If you need to be convinced, like me, just stop by or call your local tanning place and ask.
I post clips of Farrakhan like the one below and explain what he is talking about, the destruction of America and whites. He often preaches indirectly and in his own code language as does Jeremiah Wright. Often these Black Nationalist sects are like modern day mystery religions. That is, they are not that open about what the core beliefs are. Black Liberation Theology is similar.
An apparently black woman finally understood what Farrakhan is about and posted this reply. Not sure she knew that I am not exactly black.
I get it now, I didn’t pay too much attention to Farrakhan as a pre-teen, my father made fun of muslims. Even though I know how racist white people can be, it doesn’t help to hear this ideology and then be surrounded by white people 24 hours a day. I figured when he starts calling for white genocide I’ll listen, I’m 31 now and i see that black people need a military power for defense, rebellion in the 70’s or earlier would be suicide. With a black president our military is the Muslim world. I support